RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04877
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 9 March 2013 and 8 June
2013 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System
(AFFMS).
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She had a pre-existing condition which precluded her from
passing the FAs.
In support of the applicants appeal, she provides AF Form 469,
Duty Limiting Condition Report, a memo from the medical provider
and other documentation.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of airman first class.
The applicants last five FA scores are as follows:
COMPOSITE
DATE SCORE RATING
25 June 2012 82.80 SATISFACTORY
8 December 2012 68.60 UNSATISFACTORY
* 9 March 2013 74.90 UNSATISFACTORY
* 8 June 2013 69.80 UNSATISFACTORY
15 September 2013 80.00 SATISFACTORY
*Contested FA scores
On 20 February 2014, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB)
considered and denied the applicants request to remove the FAs
dated 9 March 2013 and 8 June 2013 from the AFFMS.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states IAW AFI 36-2905,
Paragraph 4.2.2 Providers will list physical limitations on the
AF Form 469. When physical limitations preclude the member from
participating in fitness activities for greater than 30 days
and/or accomplishing the FA, the member will follow local policy
to obtain an exercise prescription and determination of FA
exemption from the EP/FPM. Unless member is given a composite
exemption, member will continue to prepare for and be assessed
on non-exempt components of the FA. Paragraph 4.2.2.2 The
provider will specify the length of time required for physical
limitations. While the applicant provided a statement signed
by the medical provider stating that she had a documented
medical condition, there was no evidence that specifically
listed what the applicant's limitations were for each fitness
assessment. The applicant's AF Form 469 is dated 10 August
2013 and expired on 14 September 2013. The profile limits the
ability to being able to run more than 100 yards, no bending, no
pushing or pulling. After a thorough review of the
documentation provided by the applicant, there is insufficient
evidence to support the claim.
The DPSIM complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit
B.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 13 June 2014, a copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After a
thorough review of the evidence of record and the documentation
provided by the applicant, we believe a reasonable basis exist
to conclude that the applicant should have been exempt from
performing all components of the contested FAs. In this
respect, we note the medical provider indicated that a medical
condition precluded her from achieving a passing FA score on the
contested FAs. Given the applicants medical condition and the
documentation provided, we find the evidence supports favorable
consideration of this request. Therefore, we recommend the
applicants records be corrected as indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the
Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 9 March 2013 and 8 June 2013, be
declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management
System (AFFMS).
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-04877 in Executive Session on 25 September 2014,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 September 2013, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 14 April 2014,
w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 13 June 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05779
A resume of the applicant's FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Rating *28 Nov 12 38.40 Unsatisfactory 31 May 12 85.90 Satisfactory 13 May 11 93.90 Excellent 23 Nov 10 80.10 Good 5 May 10 79.25 Good 2 Nov 09 85.00 Good * Contested FA The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. They...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05279
On 25 Oct 13 she received an updated AF Form 469, stating that she was exempt from the cardio component of the FA. The applicant's AF Form 469 shows the cardio limitations expired on 23 Sep 13, which would have allowed the applicant to complete the cardio component of the FA. The applicant did not provide an updated AF Form 469 to show the exemption expired on a later date.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01550
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01550 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 19 Dec 12 and a duplicate FA entry dated 1 Sep 10 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). He received an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member's Qualification Status, dated 9...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04694
The applicants complete submission including: MFR fitness assessment letter, AF 469 for time period of assessment, AF 469 for assessment with passing score, medical documentation, and PT score sheet history is at Exhibit A. On 17 Dec 13, the applicants request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) citing that the member was tested within his AF 469 profile. In this respect, we note the AF Form 469 and AF Form 422 which indicate a medical condition...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00822
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 30 Jul 13 85.40 Satisfactory 1 Feb 13 75.33 Satisfactory *19 Dec 12 32.50 Unsatisfactory 7 Jun 12 83.50 Satisfactory 29 Feb 12 38.10 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02738
As a result we have concluded that the recorded AC scores are not an accurate reflection of applicant's abdominal circumference. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Dec 13 for review and comment within 30 days. The applicant has provided documentation validating he had a medical condition that affected his ability to pass the AC...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04682
The applicants last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 30 Oct 13 82.75 Exempt Satisfactory 28 Aug 13 32.60 32/0.00(1-mile walk) Unsatisfactory *13 Aug 13 71.75 Exempt Unsatisfactory 13 Feb 13 87.00 Exempt Satisfactory 7 Aug 12 80.20 15:52/44.10 Satisfactory * Contested FA A similar request was denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) on 14 Feb 14 on the basis of no letter from the commander to invalidate the Fitness Assessment. Also, no AF Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04605
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04605 XXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 Sep 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Mar...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02852
The applicant provided an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 13 March 2012, stating no push-ups. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. While the applicant requests the entire FA be removed, the AF Form 469 only exempted him from the push-up portion of the FA and not the other components.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04987
and paragraph 4.2.2.2 "The provider will specify the length of time required for physical limitations. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or...